|
Review: Minolta AF 200mm f/2.8 Apo G
1. Introduction
This lens is part of the Minolta AF G – Series that are Minolta’s high
performance class optics designed to give the highest optical quality. So let us
see if the engineers at Minolta have done their job.
The 200/2.8 lens is my favourite travel lens. The 2.8
aperture makes it good to use in low light and the 200mm focal length allows for
handholding the lens in most situations. I have used this lens on several trips to
Africa and Asia.
A summary of my thoughts on the lens follows. Remember,
this is a subjective review and your opinions might be different. This review
is based on my experience with one lens only and sample variations might occur. But anyway I hope you
find it useful.
2. Different versions
First of all you should be aware of the following. There are two different versions of this lens. The first was released in
1986 and the second in 1988. Optically the two versions are the same, but the redesigned ’88 version, called the G version, features a faster focusing gear and a new IC ROM to enable faster focusing with the i, xi and si series cameras. External changes include
one AF lock/lens function buttons and “High Speed AF Apo 200mm” decal on lens shade. There was possible to have the old version upgraded so that it is equal to the G version except for the focus hold
button but I am not sure if Minolta still does this.
The three possible versions of the 200mm/2.8 are:
o The first Apo version: slow auto focus, no AF stop button
o The upgraded Apo version: fast auto focus, no AF stop button.
o The second G – Series version: fast auto
focus, AF stop button
and ‘High Speed AF Apo 200mm' decal.
The difference between the original version and the G version according to Minolta:
The G versions have a different IC rom and gear that speed up the AF with 33%. It also has
one focus hold button located on the barrel. There are some physical differences between the versions
(e.g. the focus hold buttons). Glass is the same. "G" is an attempt at marketing. It is possible to have the original version upgraded (this has been done since the G version was introduced in 1988). The lens will get the new IC and gear but not the focus hold buttons. Minolta may not have the parts to do this anymore. Also, I understand that parts for the original are starting to get scarce and service for it may not be possible in the near future. The price for the upgrade is about $300.
|
|
|
The lens featured in this review is the second version with the focus hold
button.
3. Teleconverters
Performance with converters:
If used with the old converter, upgraded or new lenses will focus faster. If an old lens is used with new, type II converter, it focuses slowest.
Differences between the original Minolta tele converters and the Mk II version:
The old converter models focus 30% faster than the converter model IIs. This is because the high-speed
lenses with converters focused too fast for the pre-i series cameras. So Minolta slowed down the teleconverters. The old 1.4x converter has a 1:1 gear ratio, the Mark II a 1:2 reduction (for the 2x converters the numbers are 1:2 and 1:4 reduction ratio). Both work with old and new lenses, however Mark II plus slow lens gives very slow AF and old TC with fast lens sometimes overshoots or hunts. Optically the different converters are the same. The original converters can no longer be serviced, Minolta USA recommend not purchasing them for any application. That said, the
new and upgraded lenses focused faster with the original converter. Original lenses not upgraded focused slowest with the Type II converters. Minolta Japan has not concerned itself as it only deals with current matters. Minolta USA no longer has old style converters around so they can't test one way or another. As they can no longer service the older items, they no longer consider them an issue.
NB!! All the above information is obtained directly from or confirmed by Minolta USA.
4. Lens data
- Focal Length: 200mm
- Filter diameter: 72mm
- Hood Mount: Retractable sliding hood.
- Dimensions: 86mm x 134mm (diameter x length)
- Weight: 790g
- Aperture:
- Largest: f/2.8
- Smallest: f/32
- Diaphragm Blades: 9 curved aperture blades.
- Focusing:
- Method: Internal focusing.
- Minimum distance: 1.5m
- Maximum magnification: 0.16X
- Focus range limiter and one focus hold button
- Optics:
- Construction: 8 elements (2 AD glass elements)
7 groups
- Angle of view: 12°
|
With the 200mm focal length and converters you can draw distant details into the picture.
Royal Palace, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Minolta Dynax 9 with Minolta 200mm f/2.8 Apo G lens with Minolta 1.4x Apo II Teleconverter.
Fuji Sensia 100 (Photo © Marcus Karlsen)
|
|
5. Appearance and Handling
This lens
is one of the smallest and lightest 200mm f/2.8 auto focus lenses on the market.
Weighing only 790g and with a diameter of 86mm and length of 134mm it easily
fits into a small camera bag making it the ideal travel lens. I have used the
lens together with the Minolta AF 28-70mm f/2.8 G lens, the Minolta AF 1.4
teleconverter II Apo and the Minolta Dynax 9 on several trips. This combination
offers excellent optical performance and fits into a small camera bag like the
Tamrac Explorer II.
The design of the lens dates back to 1988 and consists of 8 elements in
7 groups, including 2 expensive AD glass elements to give the lens a tight
control on the chromatic aberrations. This assures high quality
and less trouble with colour fringing. The filter thread size is 72 mm and a
72mm clear protective filter comes with the lens together with a soft case. I
always use the filter to protect the front element. The soft case however
quickly found a place in the closet and has stayed there ever since. The
customary golden ring, designating a G construction, is placed at the front end
and a tiny read-out window for the distance scale with depth-of-field indications
is placed next to the AF-lock button. The lens
barrel itself has a smooth white paint finish, which looks nice but
unfortunately does not withstand wear that good. The lens itself is very well
built with a metal barrel and mount.
|
The large f/2.8 maximum aperture is useful when shooting in low light situations.
Prayers at the That Luang Festival, Vientiane, Laos.
Minolta Dynax 9 with Minolta 200mm f/2.8 Apo G lens
1/6 @ f/2.8, Fuji Sensia 100
Gitzo G1228 CF tripod
(Photo © Marcus Karlsen)
|
|
The hood is permanently attached to the lens. When you are not using the
lens, just turn the hood a little and it will loosen and slide down the lens
barrel making the lens easier to store. The hood is shorter than on similar
lenses from other manufacturers but it works fine on this lens. The
design makes the size of the lens small and it is easy and fast to pull out and
fasten the hood. I really like the design of the hood on this lens and it is one
of key features in making it the perfect travel lens. The inside of the hood is covered with black velvet to
eliminate reflections and the front has a rubber edge for protection.
The
focusing ring is slightly recessed in the barrel with a metal cover that you
can slide over it. This prevents you from interfering with its movement in auto
focus mode when the focusing ring turns. The focusing ring is a little thin
when using the lens in manual focus but it is not a big problem. The near
focusing range of the lens is 1.5m. The lens also has a step less focus range
limiter. By loosening a small knob on the lens you can turn the focus limiter
left or right and thus limit the focus range on the far or near side. To allow
the lens to use the entire focus range again, just loosen the knob and the
focusing barrel can move freely through the entire range. I must admit I have
never used the focus range limiter on this lens, however on the longer lenses
it is very useful for making the auto focus faster.
The lens
focuses by moving the lens elements by a shaft. A motor in the camera drives
the shaft, making the focusing speed dependent on which camera model the lens
is coupled with. I have tried the lens on the Minolta Dynax 700si and the
Minolta Dynax 9. On the Dynax 9 the auto focus is very fast, on the 700si it is
a little slower. Some hunting occurs but not so much that it is a problem. The
lens is also compatible with Minoltas own teleconverters as well as all third
party converters with Minolta A mount. With the Minolta AF 1.4x teleconverter
II Apo the auto focus is a little slower because of the reduction gearing in
the TC and light loss but it is still good. With the AF 2.0x teleconverter Apo the auto focus is slow and hunting
in low light. This makes it better to switch to manual focus when using the 2x
converter if the light level
is low.
In total I
find the focusing speed of the lens very good and on the Dynax 9 the lens
focuses just as fast as the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS L USM on the Canon EOS 10D
despite what some people might say. However even though I have never missed a
shoot because of the auto focus performance on this lens I still would prefer
SSM focusing because of lower noise and less hunting. And maybe the focusing
with a 2.0x converter would be better.
The lens
does not have a tripod collar, which has not been a big problem for me as I
mostly use it handheld. If you have a sturdy tripod and a good tripod head I
find that a tripod collar is not necessary when using only the lens. However if
you attach a converter the camera becomes very front heavy and a tripod collar
would certainly be preferable. But in total I don’t see this as a big problem.
6. Optical Performance
|
Different wavelengths of light come into focus at different planes. This effect is know as Chromatic aberration and can
cause a "rainbow" halo around points of light and reduced sharpness. "Standard" achromatic telephotos are corrected to
bring the red and blue components into focus at the film plane. The Anomalous Dispersion (AD) glass, used in the first
two elements of the lens, virtually eliminates the effects of lateral and longitudinal chromatic aberration, providing
increased sharpness and extremely accurate colour rendition.
|
|
|
I have tried to summarize my findings when shooting a resolution chart with the
lens to test its optical quality in the tables below.
The ratings are as follows:
* Very poor
** Poor
*** Ok
**** Good
***** Very Good
200mm f/2.8 Apo G
|
f-stop
|
Sharpness centre
|
Sharpness middle
|
Sharpness corner
|
Contrast
|
Distortion
|
Vignetting
|
Colour
|
|
2.8
|
*****
|
****
|
****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
4
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
5.6
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
8
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
16
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
200mm f/2.8 Apo G with 1.4x Apo II Tele converter
|
f-stop
|
Sharpness centre
|
Sharpness middle
|
Sharpness corner
|
Contrast
|
Distortion
|
Vignetting
|
Colour
|
|
4
|
*****
|
****
|
****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
5.6
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
8
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
16
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
200mm f/2.8 Apo G with 2.0x Apo Tele converter
|
f-stop
|
Sharpness centre
|
Sharpness middle
|
Sharpness corner
|
Contrast
|
Distortion
|
Vignetting
|
Colour
|
|
5.6
|
****
|
***
|
***
|
***
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
8
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
|
16
|
*****
|
*****
|
*****
|
****
|
no
|
no
|
neutral
|
Overall the AF 200mm f/2.8 Apo G lens delivers an excellent image
quality.
Illumination was even across the entire frame at
f/2.8, so corner light fall-off was absolutely negligible. Geometric distortion
is non-existent.
The graph below is the Minolta MTF graphs for the lens.
The graph
The graph shows MTF in percent for the two line frequencies of 10 lp/mm and 30 lp/mm, from the centre of the image (shown at left) all the way to the corner (shown at right). The bold lines represent sagital MTF (lp/mm aligned like the spokes in a wheel). The thin lines represent tangential MTF (lp/mm arranged like the rim of a wheel, at right angles to sagital lines). On the scale at the bottom 0 represents the centre of the image (on axis), 3 represents 3 mm from the centre, and 21 represents 21 mm from the centre, or the very corner of a 35 mm-film image. Separate lines show results at f8 and full aperture.
This is Minoltas own MTF graph for this lens.
7. When the image is out of focus
The word bokeh is of Japanese origin and relates to the fashion in which
the out-of-focus areas of the image are rendered. A sharply focused subject set
against a pleasingly silky smooth background characterizes a good bokeh. The
transition from in-focus to out-of-focus should occur gradually. A large number
of aperture blades give a more circular opening when the lens is stopped down,
but this in itself is not sufficient to give a good bokeh. Another feature of
the lens that affects Bokeh is the degree of spherical aberration correction.
Spherical aberration is when the rays of light from the middle and from the
outside edges of a lens do not focus to exactly the same point.
The 200mm
f/2.8 Apo G have a very pleasing image rendition, in fact, the images show an
attractive bokeh up with the very best of lenses.
|
The out of focus background are nicely blurred with smooth transactions between the highlights and the darker areas.
Red Colobus Monkey, Jozani Forest, Zanzibar, Tanzania.
Minolta Dynax 9 with Minolta 200mm f/2.8 Apo G lens.
(Photo © Marcus Karlsen)
|
|
8. Flare and ghosting
Since light reflects off glass surfaces, lens flare usually increases with
the number of glass elements in the lens. The problem is compounded with backlit
subjects.
With the 200mm f/2.8 Apo G lens flare and ghosting has not
been a problem.
9. Summary and Conclusions
This
lens may be expensive but it certainly offers the results you've paid for. It
is already a legendary Minolta lens, offering excellent optical performance
that does its job in a truly professional manner. In my opinion one of the
finest lenses on the market and a very good reason for choosing a Minolta
system as no other manufacturers offer this performance in such a small
package. The perfect travel lens.
Pros
o Excellent optical performance, even with dedicated converters
o Very good bokeh
o Very small and lightweight for this kind of lens
o Good auto focus
o Image stabilizer with the Dynax 7 Digital (built into the camera body)
Cons
o Auto focus is a little noisy.
o No tripod collar
o No image stabilizer with film body (with the Dynax 7 Digital
stabilization is in the camera body)
If
Minolta would include SSM focusing and a detachable tripod collar on this
lens without reducing the optical quality or changing the size it would be unbeatable.
With
the new Dynax 7 Digital with in body Anti Shake this lens become an amazing
300/2.8 equivalent with image stabilization weighing only 790g.
10. Magazine
lens tests
- German magazine Color Foto test results
22 out of 30 on sharpness
28 out of 30 on contrast
20 out of 20 on centering
10 out of 10 on distortion
8 out of 10 on vignetting
That makes it 88 out of 100 total and that is the best score of the Minolta
tele lenses. It is 3 points more than the Nikon AF Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 D IF
ED and 1 point less than the Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L USM II.
- German magazine Color Foto test results of the 200mm f/2.8 Apo G with
the AF 2x Teleconverter Apo
16 out of 30 on sharpness
23 out of 30 on contrast
15 out of 20 on centering
10 out of 10 on distortion
9 out of 10 on vignetting
That makes it 73 out of 100 total and that is 5 points more than the Nikon AF Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 D IF
ED with the Nikon TC-201 and 1 point less than the Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L USM
II with the Canon EF Extender 2x.
- French magazine Chasseur d’Image.
4 out of 5 in optical quality
3 out of 5 in value for money
4 out of 5 in general impression
- French magazine Chasseur d'Images test results on the Dynax/Maxxum 5D
Vignetting 4/5
Chromatic abberation 5/5
Distortion 5/5
Sharpness 3/5
Total score 4/5
- Photodo test result
Grade: 4,1
Average Weighted MTF: 0,83
Effective focal length: 193 mm
Weighted MTF for 200 mm: f2,8 0,80, f4 0,80, f8 0,84
Weighted MTF 10 lp/mm: 0,91
Weighted MTF 20 lp/mm: 0,79
Weighted MTF 40 lp/mm: 0,58
Distortion: 1,42%
If you found this review useful or if you like to leave me
some comments about my web page and images in general please follow this link to my
guest book.
You can find reviews
of some of my other lenses here...
|